New Podcast Series: “Geopolitics on the Move”

Geopolitics on the Move is a podcast series hosted by Fyodor Lukyanov and Sean Guillory. It is produced by the Graduate Initiative in Russian Studies at the Middlebury Institute of International Studies at Monterey, Russia in Global Affairs, and the Center for Russian, Eastern European, & Eurasian Studies at the University of Pittsburgh. Carnegie Corporation of New York provided funding for this project.

The world will never be the same! Really? Yes. No. Maybe. The initial shock of the coronavirus pandemic is waning as global life gets back on track. Change is inevitable. But it might be less profound than initially assumed. Force majeure of the pandemic did not disrupt the global agenda—it only exacerbated existing trends. The list of challenges grows: nationalism, the clash of identities, the fragmentation of the world economy, and the erosion of the liberal economic model. As do the responses: demands for greater sovereignty, dismantling arms control regimes, and escalating competition among major powers, especially between the United States and China. Perhaps the pandemic’s most profound impact will be on relations between people, society, and the state.

COVID hit Russia at a domestic crossroads. As the virus began to ravage the world, Russia started to reform its constitution and modify its state system. The pandemic didn’t torpedo this agenda. It simply complicated the path forward. Even without the unexpected upheavals it was clear that Russian politics was entering into a new stage. Now, the search for a new balance of forces will occur in completely different conditions.

What does Russia think? How much do Russian perspectives on international issues in this new moment differ from those of the United States? Are convergent—if not common—perceptions of the future possible? Or will our views of global politics continue to diverge?


Episode 1: “The Geopolitics of Nationalism” (click to listen)

The era of universalism in global politics is receding; nationalism, in the form of fragmentation and selfishness, is on the rise. The COVID-19 pandemic has amplified it. What does international cooperation look like when national interests are running amok? We turned to Andrei Kortunov, director general of the Russian International Affairs Council, and Anatol Lieven, professor of Georgetown University in Qatar, for their insight.

Episode 2: “The Sino-American Rivalry” (click to listen)

Just ten years ago, pundits predicted that a future Sino-American G2 would govern the world. Today, the relationship between Beijing and Washington is more often described as Cold War 2.0. The disappearance of Chimerica—a symbiosis of China and America—represents the ongoing crisis of globalization. What does the U.S.-China confrontation mean for Russia? Will Moscow take sides? Or will it be able to skillfully maneuver between the two? We discuss these issues with Ivan Safranchuk, an associate professor of MGIMO University, and Vassily Kashin, a leading researcher at the Higher School of Economics.

Episode 3: “Whither Liberal Democracy?” (click to listen)

At the end of the 20th century, liberal democracy appeared to triumph. History as a story of political evolution was over. But today, many point to a crisis of liberal democracy and fret over whether it has enough dynamism to shine again. Why has such a promising beginning turned into a whimpering finale? Is democracy really at an end? We asked Ivan Krastev, a leading researcher at the Institute for Human Sciences in Vienna, for his thoughts.

Episode 4: “Memory Wars as the New Reality” (click to listen)

There’s a joke that Russia is a country with an unpredictable past because it rewrites history to fit the present. Paradoxically, this joke now applies to many other countries as well. Who controls the rewriting of history, and what are the potential consequences? Where will memory wars lead us? Alexei Miller, professor of the European University at St. Petersburg, and Thomas Sherlock, professor at the U.S. Military Academy, West Point, discuss the politics of memory and history.